Is this model the future of college and career readiness?

A career academy high school puts 21st century skills to the test with on-the-job training

rancho-academies
North of Los Angeles, not far from the city of Ventura, the brand new Rancho Campana High School sits on a California campus fit for the set of a teen movie, where spacious, airy classrooms open — via retractable glass-paneled garage doors — onto sun soaked courtyards and outdoor learning spaces with sweeping views of the neighboring Camarillo Hills. It’s a place where all the furniture is on casters, to be reconfigured with ease, and where every building boasts a computer lab and a media commons.
If the $77 million campus, completed earlier this summer, is stunning, it’s nothing compared to what’s going on inside. Following a novel college and career readiness model, Rancho Campana divides itself into separate learning academies, designed to immerse students in one of three distinct career fields: arts and entertainment, health services, and applied engineering.
The school is obviously the newest showpiece of the Oxnard Union High School District, but it’s also of a continuation of the work began four years ago by then-newly arrived superintendent Dr. Gabe Soumakian, who has always cast an eye toward the future. “When I got here in 2011, that was one of my first projects,” Soumakian said. “To really think about the learning space that we were going to create, and the tools and resources we’d need.”

The 5 reasons schools don’t have better internet connectivity

CoSN’s Annual Infrastructure Survey outlines state of school connectivity in U.S. districts

school-connectivitySchool leaders said affordability remains the top barrier to robust internet connectivity in their schools, according to the Consortium for School Networking’s (CoSN) 3rd Annual Infrastructure Survey released November 3.
Improving network speed and capacity and increasing competition for broadband services remain significant challenges to districts as well, the survey reveals.
The results also detail the impact of changes to the E-rate program, as well as the growing issue of digital equity for technology access outside of the classroom.
“Education is going digital. Yet school system technology leaders face many challenges as they plan their education networks for the future. While progress is happening, policymakers and educators will need to keep their eyes focused on continued investments in robust, reliable education networks with broadband access and wi-fi to enable digital learning and address issues of digital equity,” said Keith Krueger, CEO, CoSN.
1. Cost
For the third consecutive year, nearly half of surveyed school systems identify the cost of ongoing recurring expenses as the biggest barrier to robust school connectivity. More than one-third of surveyed districts said that capital or upfront expenses are also a challenge to increasing robust internet connectivity.
Approximately one out of five school systems are paying $50/Mbps or more per month for their internet connection, and 18 percent pay the same high amount for their WAN connection.
Despite these affordability challenges, there are some positive trends. Internet connection affordability improved since last year, as 36 percent of surveyed school systems indicated their monthly cost per Mbps for internet connection was less than $5 per Mbps – up from 27 percent in 2014. Additionally, school systems with high monthly costs (over $50 per Mbps) for internet bandwidth decreased from 32 percent in 2014 to 19 percent in 2015.
Other major school connectivity challenges reported by school leaders regarding network speed and capacity, competition, E-rate changes, and digital equity include:
2. Network Speed & Capacity
• Inadequate Connection Speeds: Nearly a quarter of all school systems have reached only 10 percent of the Federal Communications Commission’s short-term broadband connectivity goal (100 Mbps per 1000 students).
• Inability to Offer Broadband: For 12 percent of all school leaders and 14 percent of rural school system leaders, their internet providers are at capacity and cannot offer additional bandwidth. Furthermore, one in 10 of those surveyed report that their own transport connection type was at capacity.
• Not Using Current Wireless Standards: One out of three school systems indicated that they do not use current wireless industry standards (such as 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac).
• Inadequate Internet Bandwidth: More than two-thirds of school systems do not have sufficient internet bandwidth for today and the coming 18 months. Despite the current state, one out of four school systems projected between 100 percent and 499 percent Internet growth.
• Internet Downtime: One out of four school systems reported unplanned internet downtime in their school system for at least three days during the year.
There was improvement in some areas of network speed & capacity:
• Expanding Use of Lit Fiber: More than 70 percent of school system leaders indicated that they are using lit fiber for transport types for WAN operations, a dramatic one-year increase from 46 percent in 2014. This means many more schools have the capacity to provide broadband speeds to the school door.
• Improving Wide Area Network Connection Speeds: Nearly six in 10 reported WAN speeds of 1 Gbps or more, a modest improvement from 53 percent in 2014.
• More Schools Have Faster Wireless Access Points: More than 60 percent of school systems reported typical connection speed of fast 1 Gbps access, slightly more than half in 2014.
• Increased Confidence in Wireless Connectivity: Up from 58 percent in 2014, two-thirds of school systems indicated their WiFi could handle a 1:1 initiative (28 percent very confident and 38 percent somewhat confident).
3. Lack of Competition
• Persisting Problem Coast-to-Coast: Nearly half of surveyed school systems (though down from 60 percent in 2014) indicated that lack of competition is a problem for school connectivity, often with only one internet provider serving rural districts. Without multiple providers, it is difficult for school systems to have a redundancy plan.
• Few Qualified Bids: Nearly one-third of surveyed school systems received one or fewer qualified bids for E-rate connectivity services in 2015 (Category 1).
• Challenge Amplified in Rural Areas: Lack of competition is more severe in rural school systems, with more than one-third having received one or fewer proposals for school connectivity services.
4. Impact of E-rate Changes
• Perspectives on Modernized E-rate: Nearly half of district leaders had positive views on the changes to the E-rate program to focus on broadband and LAN/Wi-Fi.
• Phase Down of POTS Affecting School Systems: Nine in 10 surveyed district leaders reported that the phase down of the plain old telephone service (POTS) significantly affected or at least somewhat affected their school system.
5. Rising Digital Inequity
• Lack of Digital Equity Strategies: Three out of four school systems do not have any off-campus strategies for connecting students at home and after school.
• Unaffordable Internet and Limited Service at Home: Overwhelmingly, 88 percent of school system leaders believe that cost was the biggest barrier for families who do not have internet access at home. Additionally, more than 40 percent of households do not have ready access to broadband service.
Gathering more than 530 responses from district leaders across 48 states, the survey results represent urban, rural, and suburban school systems as well as large, medium, and small school systems with different needs and priorities.
Conducted in partnership with AASA, The School Superintendents Association, and MDR, the report collected data from K-12 school leaders and technology directors nationwide.
To read the full results, please visit: cosn.org/Infrastructure2015.
Material from a press release was used in this report.

Great ways library media and IT departments can work together

Library media specialists and IT teams can work toward a common mission

library-mediaInformation technology (IT) departments in the K-12 environment have historically operated as their own separate entities, making decisions about, providing support for, and overseeing the successful implementation of hardware and software on campus. With more and more technology infiltrating classrooms, the IT team’s role has shifted to include more interaction and collaboration with other departments, administrators, and individual instructors.
As purveyors of digital learning materials and research, library media specialists are aligning with their IT departments to help create dynamic, engaging hubs for students and instructors. At Henrico County Public Schools in Henrico, Va., Suzanna Panter said the 50,000-student, 70-school district was an early one-to-one laptop adopter and, as such, relies on strong ties between its media and IT departments.
Panter, who is the district’s educational specialist, library services, actually has an employee who serves as a go-between for the library and the IT department. “At the library, we’re completely instructional in nature,” Panter explains, “so we don’t see eye-to-eye with IT on every issue.” During a 2015 migration to Microsoft Office 365, for example, Panter says her department had concerns about the proposed single sign-on (SSO) process, which automatically signs a user into his or her email account once signed onto Office 365.
Panter said this is just one example of how school libraries have different technology needs than other campus departments. “It’s wonderful for most users, but our library assistants don’t have their own computers,” Panter explained. “They need to log into email to check for inter-library loans, for example, but with single sign-on they wouldn’t be able to do that (i.e., the computers are logged in as ‘library user,’ for access to the circulation system).” Working with the IT department, the library came up with a work-around that includes the use of Office 365 but not SSO.

The difference between a lead learner and a principal

It’s more than a rebrand of “principal.” It’s a philosophical overhaul

Ed. note: In partnership with Lesson Planet, we asked their professional development resource arm, PD Learning Network, for the most popular videos on their site. We’ll be featuring a limited number of these, one a week, each Monday.
When Todd Nesloney was tapped to become lead learner at Webb Elementary, in Navasota, Texas, it could legitimately be called a true learning experience. Having never before served at the head of a school, he literally stepped right out of the classroom to take the job — at a time when the entire campus was going project-based.
At Webb, where about 75 percent of students are on free or reduced lunch, sinking test scores and references to a “failing school” led to low morale among parents and staff. When he took the job, Nesloney technically became the school’s principal, but echoing a growing trend he opted to downplay that title, preferring lead learner instead. Partly, it’s meant to highlight the fact that he, like everyone else at the school, was growing and learning as they navigated change.
“One of the stipulations I had when taking this role was I still want to be actively involved in the classroom,” Nesloney said. “I want to team teach, I want to fill in for teachers, I want to be with those kids. I don’t want to be stuck in an office.”
As a project-based school, Webb has been re-imagined with collaboration in mind. Whole group instruction has been shelved in favor of  goal-oriented learning, where teachers supervise as students solve problems in small groups. Technology is involved, especially when used to help kids actively create something, but it’s not necessarily a part of everything.
As a leader, Nesloney aims to be visible and to encourage teachers and students to take risks along with him. “I want them to fail, but I want them to learn from the failure.”
“We want a school where the kids feel valued,” he said. “We want them beating down the doors in the morning and crying when they have to leave in the afternoon.”

5 critical 21st century skills that go way beyond the 4 Cs

Teach students to think like entrepreneurs with these skill sets

21st-century-skillsSince the publication of his highly impactful book, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Thomas Friedman has been teaching his readers and listeners to think differently about our world and how we interact with each other. Friedman consistently talks about new skill sets that are required for anyone who wants to not only survive but truly thrive in the hyper-connected world that is life in the 21st century.
Educators have been tackling a new mindset for student learning for nearly two decades. In the early 2000s, when as a nation as we sat at the dawn of the 21st century, The Partnership for 21st Century Learning (formerly The Partnership for 21st Century Skills) introduced the education community to a Framework for 21st Century Learning, which highlighted 18 different skills. Over time leaders from a broad spectrum of business and education communities narrowed the focus to concentrate on a set of skills that came to be known as the 4Cs—communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity.
The goal was to have the 4Cs integrated with the “3Rs” that had served as the backbone of American curricula for centuries. As the K-12 education community continues the work of embedding the 4Cs into all content areas, the world continues to evolve and we find ourselves once again considering what it is all students must know and be able to do by the time they graduate from high school.
One organization that has taken on this challenge is Metiri Group, based in Marina Del Rey, California. Metiri Group, through their collaborative project with North Central Regional Education Laboratory, enGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age, helped to define the term “21st century skills” in the context that it is now widely known.
At the core of Metiri Group’s work is the belief that the skills that are necessary to be a successful entrepreneur are the same skills that all students require in order to be voracious, engaged learners. Metiri Group identifies five competencies that are essential to building entrepreneurial skills in all students: Self-Direction; Evidence Based Thinking; Persistence; Calculated Risk Taking; Tolerance for Ambiguity.

SIS itslearning and Clever partner for data integration

Partnership will help ensure secure data integration between LMS, SIS

data-integrationitslearning has announced a new relationship with Clever to provide seamless and secure data integration between the learning management system and a school’s or district’s student information system (SIS).
Specifically, schools and districts using itslearning can now use the Clever platform to ensure that student enrollment records, staff accounts, and class rosters are quickly integrated and automatically updated. Furthermore, with Clever Instant Login, students can now more easily access the itslearning platform with one click from a secure, individual portal without having to manage multiple usernames and passwords.
Designed specifically for the K-12 sector, itslearning is a cloud-based learning management system (LMS) that enables teachers to more effectively engage today’s “digitally wired” students anytime, anywhere and on any device.
“The purpose of educational technology is all about its ability to enhance the instructional experience for students and teachers,” said itslearning vice president of sales and marketing, Matt Dobosh. “But if students and teachers aren’t able to easily access software programs and digital curriculum then we are keeping them from their respective missions – of differentiated and personalized teaching and learning.”
As a student-centered learning environment, itslearning gives teachers, students and parents access, as appropriate, to course materials, assignments, communities for collaboration, professional development tools and student progress reports. The platform’s seamless integration with existing systems via Clever creates a user-friendly interface that gives teachers a way to share instructional resources, assignments and activities, and assessments with students and parents via personalized dashboards.
At the same time, students have the power to decide how they learn as the solution automatically adapts to support learning styles that offer the best opportunities for success. A proprietary “standards mastery and recommendation engine” facilitates remediation, acceleration and review by automating the recommendation of resources and activities based upon standards mastery assessments. The recommendations are also tailored specifically to the individual learning styles of each student – regardless of age, ability level, interests or special requirements.
“Partnering with exciting and innovative companies like itslearning that empower teachers and enhance learning is Clever’s goal,” said Dan Carroll, chief product officer and co-founder of Clever. “Today, Clever is used by more than a third of K-12 schools in America. Together with itslearning, we can extend the reach of our platforms and improve learning outcomes in even more schools across the country.”
Material from a press release was used in this report.

4 smart strategies to retain public school principals

“Chicago’s Fight to Keep Top Principals” reflects survey results and insights of more than 400 principals

public-school-principalsMore than 40 percent of surveyed Chicago public school principals plan to leave their positions in the next 3 years, and 25 percent said they plan to leave within the next year–data suggesting that the city is losing its principals too soon, before they can effect change in their schools.
During a City Club of Chicago event downtown on Nov. 3, The Chicago Public Education Fund (The Fund) released a comprehensive report on the state of principal quality in the city’s public schools.
The report, titled Chicago’s Fight to Keep Top Principals, is based on survey results from 423 principals within Chicago’s public schools, representing 65 percent of the city’s district-run and charter school principals.
While The Fund’s data suggest that principal performance peaks around year five, more than 60 percent of Chicago’s public school principals leave before that milestone.
“We are serious about providing world-class public schools for all of Chicago’s students, and we must keep working to create an environment that allows our best leaders to learn, grow and stay,” said Heather Y. Anichini, president and CEO of The Fund. “By listening to principal voices, we can make being a great principal in Chicago a realistic longer-term career.”
Key findings from the report include:
• While 74 percent of participating public school principals are satisfied or extremely satisfied in their roles, they also overwhelmingly say that their jobs are unsustainable.
• 40 percent or more feel unable to organize their school budget, school schedule or curriculum in ways that achieve their schools’ priorities.
• More than 70 percent of public school principals say reducing compliance is one of the top three ways to improve their job satisfaction, twice as many as those who mentioned increased compensation.

How to save money and time with asset management software

Asset management software is keeping track of textbooks and more for districts

textbooks-assetsTwo years ago Consolidated Unit School District 300 in Algonquin, Ill., was facing a pretty daunting challenge across its 26 schools. When it came to recording the inventory of assets like textbooks, some of the district’s numbers were incorrect. “We’d start a new school year thinking that we had the appropriate supplies for our students, only to find out that our inventory system didn’t reflect what we actually had on hand,” said Susan Harkin, chief operating officer for the 26-school, 21,000-student district.
A student who wasn’t matched up with an algebra book, for example, would often have to wait a week or two for it to be ordered and delivered to the classroom. And for some of the outdated books that are no longer being published, the district could spend months trying to hunt down the textbooks. “Students would start the school year without a textbook to refer to for homework,” said Harkin. “It wasn’t a good situation for a district that’s focused on student success.”
Harkin says the schools’ curriculum and instructional personnel were particularly concerned about the gaps that existed between the inventory system and the actual inventory. At the time, D300 was most concerned about textbooks, although it also wanted to improve the tracking of district-owned assets such as tablet computers and musical instruments.
Finances were another driver, says Harkin, who notes that her district spends $2,500 less than the state average per student. “Assets and resources are tight,” she added, “so everyone wants to do his or her part in helping to make sure we’re using our resources efficiently and effectively.”


11 tech integration tips to share with your school

Share these innovative tech integration tips with your team

tech-tipsEmbarking on a technology integration plan or beginning a technology pilot can be daunting. However, mapping out a clear path, being flexible, and communicating the stakeholders can help that plan be successful.
Jeff Downing, an elementary school computer specialist in California’s Fremont Unified School District, offered technology integration tips for administrators and teachers based on his experiences in his own school during a webinar for edWeb’s Digital Citizenship community.
Three years ago, Downing developed basic goals for his school, including providing every classroom with a high-quality projector, finding ways to give every student access to some type of technology each day, and increasing internet access.
At the start of the school year, every classroom in the school began with a high-quality widescreen projector, 62 iPads and 62 Chromebooks are onsite, every teacher will have a laptop, the school’s computer labs will offer 32 updated desktops, and internet access will have tripled.
“Now I feel that we can delve into using the tools and really incorporating digital citizenship into everything that we do,” he said.

Study analyzes NAEP, Common Core math alignment

Panel urges addition of more math content to NAEP math framework upon next revision

naep-mathA new study of the math alignment between the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), adopted by most states, and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the longtime barometer of academic achievement among the nation’s students, found “reasonable agreement” overall but also some areas of 4th and 8th grade math where there was less of a match.
The study, the second in a series of three examining the relationship between NAEP and the Common Core State Standards in math, was conducted by 18 math educators, supervisors and mathematicians convened by the NAEP Validity Studies Panel (NVS), an independent panel charged with examining issues related to the validity of the NAEP assessments.
The panel found that 79 percent of NAEP items in 4th grade math assessed content included in the CCSS at grade 4 or below. However, the match rate was lower in some areas: 47 percent for data analysis, statistics, and probability, 62 percent for algebra and 68 percent for geometry.
In the 8th grade, 87 percent of NAEP items assessed math included in the CCSS at grade 8 or below—a degree of alignment the report described as “strong.” At the same time, the authors found that 42 percent of the Common Core State Standards for grades 6, 7, and 8 were not being tested by any items in the 2015 NAEP item pool.
The report’s authors suggest that the National Assessment Governing Board, the bipartisan body that sets policy for the testing program, consider adding content from these areas to NAEP’s mathematics framework when it is next revised.
The panel found that most of the differences reflect the CCSS’s intention to shift instruction in certain topics to later grades. The extent to which instruction has actually been aligned with the CCSS is beyond the scope of the study, which examines only the relationship between test items and standards. The authors note that changing standards is far simpler and faster than the arduous process of changing curriculum and instruction.
“The Common Core State Standards are more focused than previous standards in their attempt to create a coherent progression in mathematics instruction from elementary to high school,” said Fran Stancavage, a managing researcher at AIR and co-author of the report. “Consequently, it is not surprising to find these differences in emphasis between the CCSS and the NAEP framework, which was last revised more than 10 years ago.”
NAEP, known for offering a dependable measure of national student progress over time, has always had to strike a balance between remaining independent of passing fashions in curriculum and instruction while also appropriately reflecting important shifts in the educational landscape, according to the report. While it is too early to know how the implementation of the Common Core State Standards will play out over the next several years, the authors point out that most states are already using CCSS-aligned assessments for the purposes of educational accountability.
“We are at a time in education when teachers, administrators and students are grappling with the changes brought about by many states’ move to new, more rigorous standards that will prepare our students for college and work,” said George Bohrnstedt, an AIR Institute Fellow and chairman of NVS’s panel. “The NVS study results suggest that as those standards are implemented, NAEP needs to ensure that it continues to be well-aligned with the mathematical content being taught in the nation’s classrooms.”
The NVS panel is planning a 3rd study for 2017 that will provide important additional data on how well NAEP is measuring the Common Core State Standards and how well Common Core content fits into the NAEP framework in math.
“Study of the Alignment of the 2015 NAEP Mathematics Items at Grades 4 and 8 to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics” can be found at www.air.org. AIR conducts the NVS under contract from the U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics.
Material from a press release was used in this report.

Is competency-based learning the next big thing in school reform?

A new proposal out of Georgia is betting it is, and supporters hope schools will implement it soon

competency-basedIn a typical Georgia school, kids like Sean Prisk would have to abide by a kind of classroom speed limit, forced to learn at the same pace as others his age. But no one stopped this Henry County seventh-grader when he stomped on the gas.
He accelerated two years ahead of his classmates in math and is now doing freshman-level work. “Math comes naturally to me,” he said.
Sean entered Locust Grove Middle School as it was implementing “competency-based” learning, which tailors schooling to each child’s ability. Students who excel move on. Those who are struggling slow down and try different methods, like exploring math or science concepts through art.
The school’s computer-based approach could be replicated across the state if education reformers appointed by Gov. Nathan Deal get their way. There’s no conclusive evidence that it works better than traditional methods, but there is a growing group of proponents in other states. Many wonder whether it will prove too expensive, widening the gap between schools that can and cannot afford it, but advocates say it doesn’t have to be costly.
Locust Grove Principal Anthony Townsend believes his students are more engaged and learning more under the new approach. He says test data back that up. In 2014, students who participated in the computerized component of the program had 2 percentage point higher pass rates in math, English and reading than students who did not. The pass rates in social studies and science were each 9 percentage points higher.
The school is drawing attention. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is giving Henry County Schools more than $4 million based in part on Locust Grove, and people who have the ear of Gov. Nathan Deal see something worth emulating.
“It’s really hard to argue against it,” said Matt Arthur, deputy commissioner of the Technical College System of Georgia. He led a subcommittee of the governor’s Education Reform Commission tasked with finding ways to improve graduation rates and preparation for college and careers. Arthur’s subcommittee, of which Townsend is a member, recommended that Deal create an educational system based partly on the work being done in Locust Grove.
Observers, including teachers advocates, say the idea sounds promising but warn it could be too expensive.
A school full of students progressing at different rates could “wreak havoc” on classroom management, said Craig Harper, a spokesman for the Professional Association of Georgia Educators. He and others say the proposal would require new money for training, technological support and more teachers.
But Arthur, who until last year was director of education reform at the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, did not recommend more money. “The state can’t afford that, and local systems can’t afford it either,” he said. “So you have to figure out a way to do it.”
Arthur’s panel proposed one change that could make it easier: Give the Georgia Milestones Tests, which are administered in the spring, more often. Arthur’s subcommittee wants multiple testing windows across the school year, so students can pass and move to the next level sooner.
The concept of competency-based learning has been around for decades, but was hard to pull off until the proliferation of two things: computers and universal educational standards.
Standards — the knowledge and skills students must acquire to master a subject — became universal under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which mandated annual tests and penalized schools with low pass rates.
Computers have become less expensive and easier to use, giving students a way to learn at their own pace while automatically tracking their progress.
Camille Farrington of the University of Chicago says the effectiveness of competency-based learning is unproven, but it is worth exploring because the traditional way of teaching, with lectures and books, isn’t effective with many students. “The reason everyone is trying to find something different is because there’s a clear problem with what we’ve been doing,” said Farrington, a senior research associate.
Zirka Franko, a veteran teacher at Locust Grove, likes the way she can tailor assignments to each child. On a recent afternoon in her bustling seventh-grade science and math class, students were choosing whether to take a computerized quiz or draw a diagram of a concept they were learning. Students are more engaged if they can make choices, she said. On one earlier assignment, for instance, some wanted to demonstrate what they’d learned by making a movie trailer. “I wouldn’t have thought of that,” she said. “Some of them are artists, some of them like computers and some of them just like books.”
Franko, who has been teaching more than two dozen years, said her students have “blossomed” under the new model.
The Education Reform Commission approved the proposal this month and will forward it to the governor. If Deal chooses to run with it without state funding, schools with less money might find it difficult to implement, said Jimmy Stokes, who leads a Georgia advocacy group for school superintendents, principals and administrators.
“It’s going to be a situation, unfortunately, of the haves and have-nots,” said Stokes, the executive director of the Georgia Association of Educational Leaders.
Townsend, the Locust Grove principal, said resources were not a constraint for him, and this model doesn’t have to be expensive. The school district supplied computers, but he didn’t hire more teachers and he didn’t get more money in the beginning. The Gates money came later.
Like most principals, he already had a teacher-training budget. He just spent it differently. The hard part, he said, was identifying quality programs for his teachers and getting them, and the parents, to accept something new and untested.
He worked smaller classrooms into the schedule with the help of computers. How? He rotates kids through a big digital lab where about 70 students work independently on assignments, with help from a teacher and some aides. That frees up other teachers to run classrooms of 15 to 20 students — about two-thirds to half the typical size.
The computer focus caused a backlash from some parents. Kimberly Del Rosario, the PTSO president at Locust Grove, said her daughter struggled to adapt to the online coursework. Del Rosario ultimately decided that the benefits were worth it, though: her daughter came to feel an ownership over her education, Del Rosario said. “I have seen confidence in my daughter that I have never seen before.”
Aydan Smith, a sixth-grade student, likes the way his teachers run school now. Before, he had to wait while the other children caught up to him, and sometimes he’d get confused by the time they did.
“I feel much more comfortable with this because I’m able to go at my own pace,” said Aydan, 11. “The teachers won’t hold me back, and they will catch me up if I fall behind.”
©2015 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta, Ga.). Visit The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta, Ga.) at www.ajc.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

How tech can make selecting the right college easier for students

2 companies use data to make it easier for selecting the right college to fit student needs

finding-collegeUnlike the discerning “sorting hat” featured in Harry Potter—which takes its time to analyze every budding wizard’s brain to figure out which of the four houses of Hogwarts is right for him or her—the college selection is a pretty arbitrary process.
Most of the time it’s based on geographic location, availability of specific majors, a family attachment, or even a favorite collegiate sports team. Unless students are proactive about seeking help, most receive very little support in this area; middle schoolers get even less attention.
Yet when 17- or 18-year-old high school graduates get to college, they’re supposed to know not only what they want to do for the next four to five years—but also for the rest of their lives.
“There are so many higher education choices for students to pick from, how are they supposed to make the right selection?” asks Lily Matos DeBlieux, superintendent at the Pendergast Elementary School District in Phoenix. “These decisions are difficult enough for adults, let alone for kids. What if the school isn’t a good fit? What if it’s not a good socioeconomic match? What if the culture isn’t what you thought it would be? These are important questions that can’t be answered by taking a college tour.”
No snap decisions
These things can bog down the average student, who at such a young age really doesn’t understand the long-term implications of his or her decision. “This is a lifetime commitment,” said DeBlieux, “and they need tools that can help them make the best possible decisions.”
A couple of companies are taking a stab at the problem and using technology to help students make better choices when selecting a college. In Washington, D.C., vibeffect has developed an algorithm-based, college-decision framework platform that students and families can use to scientifically narrow down their choices. This “unbiased, fact-based lens” costs $96 (per report) and uses a list of 66 different variables associated with the individual and measures those variables against the features of over 1,000 colleges.
vibeffect’s individual variables include things like whether a prospective applicant has held a job, whether he or she likes working independently or on a team, and if the person is apt to ask for help (or not). On the college side, vibeffect factors in a school’s use of innovative teaching techniques, transportation options, and social opportunities. “Through that,” said Elena Maria Cox, co-founder and CEO, “we’re able to create correlations between an individual and the campus features that will help them thrive.”
Newer Posts Older Posts
© Copyright Free Educations Published.. Blogger Templates
Back To Top